ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
Influence of anaerobic adhesive on the resonance frequency analysis measured in abutments with external hexagon and conical connections: an in vitro study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cytocompatibility assessment of an anaerobic adhesive for use in implant dentistry: An in vitro study.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate whether the application of an anaerobic adhesive (AA) to the abutment screws interferes with the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values in abutments with external hexagon (EHC) and conical connections (CC). MATERIALS AND
methods20 implants 4.0 mm x 10 mm were used, with similar formats, 10 with EHC and 10 with CC, inserted by the same operator into fresh bovine ribs. The abutment was then screwed with a high precision digital torque meter, and resonance frequency was measured. The abutments were then unscrewed, a drop of Loctite 242 adhesive was applied along the entire length of the thread, the abutments were screwed again (Groups EHC-AA and CC-AA). The ISQ was registered immediately, 24 h, and 72 h after installation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests (p < 0.05).
resultsISQ values measured in abutments without AA were significantly higher than those measured after applying the adhesive, for EHC and CC. The one-way repeated measures ANOVA showed that, in the intragroup analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the ISQ, comparing the three measurement moments after applying the adhesive, irrespective of connection system (CC: F = 0.191, p = 0.827; EHC: F = 0.323, p = 727), which suggests that the adhesive curing does not affect the ISQ.
conclusionsThe use of an AA on abutment screws had a significant effect on RFA measurements, for EHC and CC. The curing time of the AA did not affect the ISQ values measured in the abutments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ISQ values cannot be compared in situations with and without AA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39609285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.