ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Clonal evolution defines risk stratification for central nervous system leukemia in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well established that central nervous system leukemia (CNSL) is an adverse prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet whether prognostic heterogeneity reside in CNSL is less addressed. Therefore, we aimed to develop potential risk classification for CNSL. We retrospectively analyzed a study in PDT-ALL-2016 pediatric-inspired cohort (N = 494). Flow cytometry (FCM) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were tested on bone marrow (BM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The 5-year OS of 437 non-CNSL patients was 62.3% and 33.7% in 57 CNSL patients (P < 0.001). 57 CNSL including 16 primary CNS involvement and 41 CNS relapse patients were divided into 3 groups. The 5-year OS was 48.9% in patients with concordant FCM and NGS between BM and CSF, which were defined as non-clonal evolutionary CNSL, a standard-risk subgroup, while the 5-year OS was 30.2% in patients with discordant FCM or NGS between BM and CSF and isolated CNS relapse (P < 0.05), which were defined as clonal evolutionary CNSL, a high-risk subgroup. Furthermore, the mean times of lumbar punctures to achieve complete remission (CR) in CSF was 4.14 in clonal evolutionary CNSL, comparing to 1.62 in non-clonal evolutionary CNSL (P < 0.05). Based on the evidence of clonal evolution, we develop a risk stratification for CNSL for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39609281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.