Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609077›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Employment and deployment of additional staff roles in general practice: a realist evaluation of what works for whom, how, and why.

Imelda McDermott, Sharon Spooner, Kath Checkland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: a retrospective cohort study in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Helping general practice find its groove again.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imelda McDermottCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0002-1949-2362
Sharon SpoonerCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-3673
Kath ChecklandCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester.ORCID 0000-0002-9961-5317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England in 2019 to alleviate workforce pressures in general practice by funding additional staff such as clinical pharmacists, paramedics, first-contact physiotherapists, and from 1 October 2024 the scheme funds recently qualified GPs. However, the employment and deployment models of ARRS staff present ongoing complexities and challenges that require further exploration.

aimTo explore the decision-making processes behind primary care networks (PCNs) and general practice staffing choices, and how these choices influence the operationalisation of ARRS. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a qualitative case study across four PCNs in England using a realist evaluation framework.

methodData collection took place between September 2022 and November 2023. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with PCN clinical directors, GPs, practice managers, and ARRS staff (

resultsDirect employment models fostered staff development and retention, contingent on established trust among practices. Subcontracting was favoured to mitigate employment risks but could lead to unintended consequences such as conflicting accountabilities and less integration with existing GP practice staff. The optimal deployment model involved rotations across a limited number of GP practices, ideally two, with one serving as a base, ensuring consistency in training and management.

conclusionThis study provides novel insights into the complexities of different employment and deployment models of ARRS staff. These findings will be invaluable for creating a sustainable GP practice workforce and informing future workforce strategies as the scheme expands to include recently qualified GPs.

Indexed as

EmploymentGeneral PracticePrimary Health CareEnglandHumansQualitative Researchadditional rolesgeneral practicenew rolesprimary health carequalitative researchworkforce

Identifiers

PMID39609077
PMCPMC11800407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.