Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609016›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Developing the TIDieR-Rehab checklist: a modified Delphi process to extend the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) for rehabilitation intervention reporting.

Nada Signal, Sharon Olsen, Emeline Gomes, Caitlin McGeorge, Denise Taylor, Gemma Alder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quasi-experimental studies in theJournal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nada SignalHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand nada.signal@aut.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-9595-0532
Sharon OlsenHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-9127
Emeline GomesHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6871-3790
Caitlin McGeorgeHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Denise TaylorHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-5702
Gemma AlderHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-0375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRehabilitation is essential for supporting the recovery from, and management of, a range of health conditions. However, interventions are often poorly reported in rehabilitation research, hindering advancement of the field. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was developed to enhance the reporting of interventions, but does not specifically address the complexities and multifaceted nature of rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to develop an extension of the TIDieR checklist to support better reporting of rehabilitation interventions.

designA modified Delphi study overseen by a Steering Committee.

settingOnline.

participantsRehabilitation experts were purposively sampled for diversity in discipline, practice setting, area of expertise and geographical location.

methodsParticipants (n=35) provided both quantitative and qualitative feedback on drafts of the TIDieR-Rehab through online surveys. Quantitative data was descriptively analysed by percentage of agreement, while qualitative data was analysed using conventional content analysis. Quantitative and qualitative findings were subsequently triangulated to facilitate iterative refinement of the TIDieR-Rehab.

resultsConsensus was achieved after two rounds of the modified Delphi process. The TIDieR-Rehab checklist comprises seven original, three adapted and 12 new reporting items, and is supported by a supplementary manual. Specific enhancements include more detailed descriptions of the study population (

conclusionThe TIDieR-Rehab checklist marks a significant advancement in enhancing and standardising the reporting of rehabilitation interventions. By offering a structured format for detailing complex rehabilitation interventions, the TIDieR-Rehab supports improvements in reporting quality to promote research replication and support the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Future research should validate the TIDieR-Rehab checklist across a variety of intervention types and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

ChecklistDelphi TechniqueConsensusHumansRehabilitation ResearchResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesphysical therapy modalitiespsychosocial interventionqualitative researchrehabilitation medicinestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID39609016
PMCPMC11603707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.