Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39608991›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Parent carer and disabled young people's perspectives on the impacts of changes to service provision for children and young people in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Hannah Merrick, Helen Driver, Lily Potts, Catherine Exley, Amanda Allard, Christopher Morris, Jeremy R Parr, Lindsay Pennington, Resetting Services Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah MerrickPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK hannah.merrick@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2714-0129
Helen DriverPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Lily PottsNewcastle University School of Psychology, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine ExleyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Amanda AllardCouncil for Disabled Children, National Children's Bureau, London, UK.
Christopher MorrisPeninsula Childhood Disability Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-507X
Jeremy R ParrPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Lindsay PenningtonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Resetting Services Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn England, the delivery of health, education and social care services changed substantially during COVID-19. Some services closed, some had reduced capacity and there was a shift to the use of telehealth. This study aimed to understand how families of children and young people with neurodisability experienced these service changes, what did or did not work well for them and what impact the service changes had on them.

designQualitative study with parent carers of children (aged 0-19 years) with neurodisability accessing children's health, social care and education-based services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

settingParticipants were recruited from five local authority areas in England and interviewed via telephone and/or video call.

participants48 parent carers (45 mothers, three fathers) were interviewed and nine young people (aged 8-16 years). Across the parent carers there were 55 children with neurodisability (43 males, 12 females), ranging from 3 to 19 years. Children had a range of diagnoses, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cerebral palsy, genetic conditions and epilepsy. Nine young people (aged 8-16 years; eight males, one female) were interviewed; two individually, three in a focus group and four with their parent carer.

resultsFour themes were identified: (1) communication of service changes, (2) access to services during the pandemic, (3) impacts of service changes and (4) learning for future emergencies and resetting services. Communication of service changes was reported as poor and confusing. Access to services during the pandemic varied. Medical services continued with least disruption; therapeutic, education-based and social care services were severely disrupted. Service changes had a detrimental impact on families coping with high levels of medical care and physical and behavioural support. Young people experienced negative impacts of service change on their physical, mental and behavioural health.

conclusionsServices for children with neurodisability require a person-led, family centred approach with strong multidisciplinary team working. Findings indicated the need for improved communication within and between services, and between services and families and young people. Planning for future emergencies needs to factor in the specific health and care needs of children with neurodisability and maintain access to services, in particular, those accessed through schools.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19ParentsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultChildChild Health ServicesChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalecaregiversCOVID-19developmental neurology & neurodisabilityhealth services

Identifiers

PMID39608991
PMCPMC11603685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.