ArticleRMD open2024
Performance of the EULAR Systemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis.
Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSystemic sclerosis Impact of Disease (ScleroID) is the first comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically developed for systemic sclerosis (SSc). We investigated the performance of ScleroID in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), as a prerequisite for its use in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing potentially disease-modifying drugs.
methodsAll patients with dcSSc from the large, multicentric, ScleroID cohort were included. SSc-Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EuroQol-5 Dimensions and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used as comparators. The study includes a longitudinal arm with a reliability visit at 7±3 days and a 12 months follow-up visit. The performance of ScleroID in dcSSc was assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology filter.
resultsIn total, 152 dcSSc patients were analysed (29% male, median age 54 years). ScleroID reflected well the disease impact of dcSSc, showing a good construct validity with high Spearman's correlation coefficients with comparators (SSc-HAQ, 0.79, 95% CI (0.69, 0.86); HAQ-Disability Index, 0.72 95% CI (0.60, 0.80); SF-36 physical score, -0.69 95% CI (-0.77, -0.60)). The internal consistency was strong (Cronbach's alpha 0.87, split-half reliability coefficient 0.88).In the longitudinal arm, 44 patients had a reliability visit and 113 had a follow-up visit, of whom 19/113 (17%) reported a significant change (11 improved, 8 worsened). ScleroID showed a good consistency and discriminative ability with excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.89, 95% CI (0.84, 0.92)) and moderate sensitivity to change (standardised response mean -0.63 in the improved subgroup and 0.48 in the worsened subgroup), but superior to the comparators.
conclusionThe European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) ScleroID performs well for patients with dcSSc. This supports its inclusion and regular assessment as PROM in RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.