ArticleStatistics in medicine2024
Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With Zero-Inflated Data.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One goal of precision medicine is to develop effective treatments for patients by tailoring to their individual demographic, clinical, and/or genetic characteristics. To achieve this goal, statistical models must be developed that can identify and evaluate potentially heterogeneous treatment effects in a robust manner. The oft-cited existing methods for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity are based upon parametric models with interactions or conditioning on covariate values, the performance of which is sensitive to the omission of important covariates and/or the choice of their values. We propose a new Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) method for estimating heterogeneous causal effects in studies with zero-inflated outcome data, which arise commonly in health-related studies. We employ the enriched Dirichlet process (EDP) mixture in our BNP approach, establishing a connection between an outcome DP mixture and a covariate DP mixture. This enables us to estimate posterior distributions concurrently, facilitating flexible inference regarding individual causal effects. We show in a set of simulation studies that the proposed method outperforms two other BNP methods in terms of bias and mean squared error (MSE) of the conditional average treatment effect estimates. In particular, the proposed model has the advantage of appropriately reflecting uncertainty in regions where the overlap condition is violated compared to other competing models. We apply the proposed method to a study of the relationship between heart radiation dose parameters and the blood level of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to examine if the effect of a high mean heart radiation dose on hs-cTnT varies by baseline characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.