Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39608798›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2024

Conceptual framework for data harmonisation in mental health using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an example with the R2D2-MH consortium.

Melissa H Black, Jan Buitelaar, Tony Charman, Christine Ecker, Louise Gallagher, Kristien Hens, Emily Jones, Declan Murphy, Yair Sadaka, Marie Schaer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Melissa H BlackCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Department of Women's and Children's Health, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden melissa.black@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0293-4053
Jan BuitelaarDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tony CharmanDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Christine EckerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Autism Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Louise GallagherChild and Youth Mental Health Collaborative, SickKids, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristien HensDepartment of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Emily JonesCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, University of London, London, UK.
Declan MurphyInstitute for Translational Neurodevelopment, King's College London, London, UK.
Yair SadakaNeurodevelopmental Research Center, Mental Health Institute, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Marie SchaerAutism Brain & Behavior Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Beate St PourcainDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dieter WolkeDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Stef Bonnot-BrieyHANDI-VOICE, Paris, France.
Thomas BourgeronHuman Genetics and Cognitive Functions, Institut Pasteur, UMR3571 CNRS, IUF, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sven BölteCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Department of Women's and Children's Health, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvancing research and support for neurologically diverse populations requires novel data harmonisation methods that are capable of aligning with contemporary approaches to understanding health and disability.

objectivesWe present the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework to support harmonisation of mental health data and present a proof of principle within the Risk and Resilience in Developmental Diversity and Mental Health (R2D2-MH) consortium.

method138 measures from various mental health datasets were linked to the ICF following the WHO's established linking rules.

findingsFindings support the notion that the ICF can assist in the harmonisation of mental health data. The high level of shared ICF codes provides indications of where items may be readily harmonised to develop datasets that may align more readily with contemporary approaches to understanding health and disability. Although the linking process necessarily entails an element of subjectivity, the application of established rules can increase rigour and transparency of the harmonisation process.

conclusionsWe present the first steps towards data harmonisation in mental health that is compatible with contemporary approaches in psychiatry, being more capable of capturing diversity and aligning with more transdiagnostic and neurodiversity-affirmative ways of understanding data. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings show promise, but future work is needed to address quantitative harmonisation. Similarly, issues related to the traditionally 'pathophysiological' frameworks that existing datasets are often embedded in can hinder the full potential of harmonisation based on the ICF.

Indexed as

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPersons with DisabilitiesPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID39608798
PMCPMC11603809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.