ReviewCancer letters2025
Pulsed electric field ablation as a candidate to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Review in Cancer letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsed Electric Field Ablation Reprograms Tumor Immunity and Stimulates Germinal Center Formation in Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of pulsed electric field therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review of a novel minimally invasive intervention.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Immunogenic cell death as a cornerstone for combination therapies with immune checkpoint blockade.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Neuro-Immune Crosstalk: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2026Review
- The role of bronchoscopic cryoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: current evidence and future perspectives.Immunotherapy · 2026Review
- Case Report: Pulsed electric field treatment of metastatic liver disease demonstrating a possible abscopal response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Case Report: durable response to pulsed electric field ablation in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in HER2-low breast cancer through activation of interferon signaling.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Six-Month Local Control Rates and Immune Responses After Pulsed Electric Field Ablation in Metastatic Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Pulsed electric fields: a sharp sword in the battle against cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Bronchoscopic Pulsed Electric Field for Ablation and Inmunomodulation in Early-stage Non-small Lung Cancer: A Case Report.Open respiratory archives · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer ablation with pulsed electric fields (PEFs) involves the delivery of high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses that destabilize tumor cells, leading to cellular death. Unlike most conventional ablation technologies, PEF ablation is non-thermal, allowing for safe and targeted energy delivery to the tumor without damaging surrounding tissue and critical structures. PEFs allow for specific dosing, predictable treatment zones, and preservation of the extracellular matrix and adjacent vascular tissues. Preclinical and preliminary clinical data suggest that PEF ablation may induce inflammatory changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that engage host innate and adaptive immune cells, stimulating an anti-tumor response. Specifically, PEF promotes local and systemic anti-tumor immune activation through immunogenic cell death and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and tumor antigens. This tumor-specific immune activation could potentially enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. Furthermore, PEF ablation induces the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in the TME, which are predictive biomarkers for responsiveness to ICI across several solid tumors. This combination of effects activates antigen-presenting cells and stimulates the effector T cell response, which is often inhibited in ICI-resistant cancer patients. In this review, the onco-immunological characteristics of PEF ablation are discussed, with special emphasis placed on the clinical potential of PEF ablation to induce anti-cancer immune responses and enhance responsiveness to ICI therapy in ablated and non-ablated (abscopal) tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.