Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39608443›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2025

Pulsed electric field ablation as a candidate to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Blake M Arciga, Dustin M Walters, Eric T Kimchi, Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll, Guangfu Li, Emma Teixeiro, Satyanarayana Rachagani, Jussuf T Kaifi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blake M ArcigaRoy Blunt NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Hugh E. Stephenson Jr., M.D., Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Dustin M WaltersDepartment of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Eric T KimchiDepartment of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kevin F Staveley-O'CarrollDepartment of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Guangfu LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Emma TeixeiroRoy Blunt NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Hugh E. Stephenson Jr., M.D., Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Satyanarayana RachaganiRoy Blunt NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: srachagani@missouri.edu.
Jussuf T KaifiRoy Blunt NextGen Precision Health Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Hugh E. Stephenson Jr., M.D., Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA; Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: kaifij@health.missouri.edu.

Funding

Targeting tumor and its microenvironment using nanotherapeutics for pancreatic cancerR01CA247763 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RACHAGANI, SATYANARAYANA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
CSRD VA I01 CX002498NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer ablation with pulsed electric fields (PEFs) involves the delivery of high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses that destabilize tumor cells, leading to cellular death. Unlike most conventional ablation technologies, PEF ablation is non-thermal, allowing for safe and targeted energy delivery to the tumor without damaging surrounding tissue and critical structures. PEFs allow for specific dosing, predictable treatment zones, and preservation of the extracellular matrix and adjacent vascular tissues. Preclinical and preliminary clinical data suggest that PEF ablation may induce inflammatory changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that engage host innate and adaptive immune cells, stimulating an anti-tumor response. Specifically, PEF promotes local and systemic anti-tumor immune activation through immunogenic cell death and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and tumor antigens. This tumor-specific immune activation could potentially enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. Furthermore, PEF ablation induces the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in the TME, which are predictive biomarkers for responsiveness to ICI across several solid tumors. This combination of effects activates antigen-presenting cells and stimulates the effector T cell response, which is often inhibited in ICI-resistant cancer patients. In this review, the onco-immunological characteristics of PEF ablation are discussed, with special emphasis placed on the clinical potential of PEF ablation to induce anti-cancer immune responses and enhance responsiveness to ICI therapy in ablated and non-ablated (abscopal) tumors.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAblation TechniquesAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnti-tumor immunityCancer ablationImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapyPulsed electric field ablation

Identifiers

PMID39608443
PMCPMC11625606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.