Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607999›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Exploring Participants' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions With Qualitative Methods: Guidance for Researchers.

Kristin Harrison Ginsberg, Katie Babbott, Anna Serlachius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristin Harrison Ginsberg *Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0636-3676
Katie Babbott *Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-5578
Anna Serlachius *Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-8351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health interventions have gained prominence in recent years, offering innovative solutions to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes. Researchers are increasingly using qualitative approaches to explore patient experiences of using digital health interventions. Yet, the qualitative methods used in these studies can vary widely, and some methods are frequently misapplied. We highlight the methods we find most fit for purpose to explore user experiences of digital tools and propose 5 questions for researchers to use to help them select a qualitative method that best suits their research aims.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchDelivery of Health CareDigital HealthHumansResearch PersonnelTelemedicinebehavior changecontent analysisdigital healthdigital health evaluationdigital health interventionhealth careinnovationmHealthmobile healthpatient experiencequalitative methodsqualitative researchresearcherresearch methodsstudy designtechnologytelemedicinethematic analysistutorialusabilityuser engagementuser experience

Identifiers

PMID39607999
PMCPMC11638693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.