ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Exploring the need for a preload on the estimation of permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume in MR vascular fingerprinting-based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Spin- and Gradient-Echo Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI for Microvascular Characterization at 7 Tesla.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Technical Review of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Applications in Cerebral Physiology.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Review
- Multiplanar MRI approach to the differential diagnosis of central nervous system tumors and tumor-like lesions in patients with HIV: what radiologists need to know.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Percentage of signal recovery (PSR): a more accurate marker than rCBV for differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the need for a preload on the estimation of permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume in MR vascular fingerprinting-based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is commonly part of the clinical brain tumor imaging protocol. Usually, a preload of contrast agent is administered to minimize contrast-leakage T
methodsA previously established simulation model was used to create a dictionary of DSC-MRVF signals resulting from a double-bolus injection with varying input values for permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). A sensitivity analysis based on a Cramer Rao Lower Bound approach was performed, from which the logarithmic ratio of standard deviations for parameter estimation was derived. A ratio above zero corresponded with a better determination without preload. Two brain tumor patients were included for validation.
resultsThe results show that the standard deviation for determining permeability was lower without preload, whereas for determining rCBV, the opposite result was found. For vessel radius, the standard deviation was similar with and without preload. The in vivo data reasonably agreed with the simulation results.
conclusionThis work has shown the potential of DSC-MRVF with a single bolus injection for determining vessel radius and permeability, although for rCBV, a preload is still advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.