ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Ungated, plug-and-play preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI using radial FLASH with segmented saturation.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimization of Pulsed Saturation Transfer MR Fingerprinting (ST MRF) Acquisition Using the Cramér-Rao Bound and Sequential Quadratic Programming.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeElectrocardiography (ECG) and respiratory-gated preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI acquisitions are difficult because of variable saturation recovery with T
methodsThe proposed method consists of segmented saturation modules with radial FLASH readouts and golden angle progression. The segmented saturation blocks drive the system to steady-state, and because center k-space is sampled repeatedly, steady-state saturation dominates contrast during gridding and reconstruction. Ten complete Z-spectra were acquired in healthy mice using both ECG and respiratory-gated and ungated methods. Z-spectra were also acquired at multiple saturation B
resultsThere was no significant difference between CEST contrasts (amide, Cr, magnetization transfer) calculated from images acquired using ECG and respiratory-gated and ungated methods (p = 0.27, 0.11, 0.47). A saturation power of 1.8μT provides optimal contrast amplitudes for both amide and total Cr contrast without significantly complicating CEST contrast quantification because of water direct saturation, magnetization transfer, and RF spillover between amide and Cr pools. Further, variability in CEST contrast measurements was significantly reduced using the ungated radial FLASH acquisition (p = 0.002, 0.006 for amide and Cr, respectively).
conclusionThis method enables CEST mapping in the murine myocardium without the need for cardiac or respiratory gating. Quantitative CEST contrasts are consistent with those obtained using gated sequences, and per-contrast variance is significantly reduced. This approach makes preclinical cardiac CEST-MRI easily accessible, even for investigators without prior experience in cardiac imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.