ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2024
Patch-based convolutional neural networks for automatic landmark detection of 3D facial images in clinical settings.
Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Equivalence of a CNN-Based Automated Soft Tissue Landmark Detection System on 2D Facial Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Present and Future of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a Deep Learning Model to Automatically Identify Palatal Landmarks on Three-Dimensional Maxillary Dental Casts.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Advanced 3D Facial Scanning in Orthodontics: A Correlative Analysis of Craniofacial Anthropometric Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The accuracy of automated facial landmarking - a comparative study between Cliniface software and patch-based Convoluted Neural Network algorithm.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe facial landmark annotation of 3D facial images is crucial in clinical orthodontics and orthognathic surgeries for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. While manual landmarking has traditionally been the gold standard, it is labour-intensive and prone to variability.
objectiveThis study presents a framework for automated landmark detection in 3D facial images within a clinical context, using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and it assesses its accuracy in comparison to that of ground-truth data. MATERIAL AND
methodsInitially, an in-house dataset of 408 3D facial images, each annotated with 37 landmarks by an expert, was constructed. Subsequently, a 2.5D patch-based CNN architecture was trained using this dataset to detect the same set of landmarks automatically.
resultsThe developed CNN model demonstrated high accuracy, with an overall mean localization error of 0.83 ± 0.49 mm. The majority of the landmarks had low localization errors, with 95% exhibiting a mean error of less than 1 mm across all axes. Moreover, the method achieved a high success detection rate, with 88% of detections having an error below 1.5 mm and 94% below 2 mm.
conclusionThe automated method used in this study demonstrated accuracy comparable to that achieved with manual annotations within clinical settings. In addition, the proposed framework for automatic landmark localization exhibited improved accuracy over existing models in the literature. Despite these advancements, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this research, such as that it was based on a single-centre study and a single annotator. Future work should address computational time challenges to achieve further enhancements. This approach has significant potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of orthodontic and orthognathic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.