ArticleTargeted oncology2025
Immunotherapy Following Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase‑Positive Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathogen spectrum and management strategies for opportunistic infections in lung cancer in the immunotherapy era: recent advances from fungi to mycobacteria.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKis) are the effective initial treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most patients experience resistance to ALKis, leading to the need for alternative therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a standard NSCLC treatment. On the other hand, their efficacy remains unclear for ALK-positive NSCLC.
objectiveWe aim to describe the treatment patterns and treatment outcomes for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC receiving later-line ICI treatment.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used claims data from Japanese acute care hospitals and included patients with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases, 10th version (ICD-10), code: C34) diagnosed between 1 December 2015 and 31 January 2023. We extracted patients who received ALKis as first-line therapy and subsequent lines of treatment. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns and durations were descriptively summarized. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for ICIs was examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
resultsOf 478 patients who received ALKi as first-line treatment, 30 received ICIs, 249 ALKis, and 154 non-ICI/ALKi therapy as second-line treatment. Most patient characteristics showed no differences among the groups. ICIs were more likely to be administered to patients who underwent shorter durations of ALKi treatment. The median TTD for ICIs was 66 days, with a 1 year TTD rate of 13%.
conclusionsGiven the rarity of ALK-positive NSCLC, this study contributes to add evidence through an expanded database and increased sample size, supporting previous suggestions that ICIs have limited effectiveness in patients positive for ALK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39607635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.