Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607621›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2024

Mapping surface soil organic carbon density of cultivated land using machine learning in Zhengzhou.

Hengliang Guo, Jinyang Wang, Dujuan Zhang, Jian Cui, Yonghao Yuan, Haoming Bao, Mengjiao Yang, Jiahui Guo, Feng Chen, Wenge Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hengliang GuoNational Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Jinyang WangSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Dujuan ZhangNational Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Jian CuiHenan Institute of Geological Survey, Zhengzhou, 450001, China. 2021811@zzuli.edu.cn.
Yonghao YuanSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Haoming BaoSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Mengjiao YangSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Jiahui GuoSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Feng ChenSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Wenge ZhouSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Gang WuNational Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Yang GuoNational Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Haitao WeiSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Baojin QiaoSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Shan ZhaoSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.

Funding

Major Science and Technology Special Projects in Henan Province 221100210600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for improving soil carbon sinks and achieving the "double-carbon" goal. This study introduces ten auxiliary variables based on the data from a 2021 land quality survey in Zhengzhou and a multi-objective regional geochemical survey. It uses geostatistical ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation, as well as classical machine learning (ML) models, including random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), to map soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in the topsoil layer (0 - 20 cm) of cultivated land. It partitions the sampling data to assess the generalization capability of the machine learning models, with Zhongmu County designated as an independent test set (dataset2) and the remaining data as the training set (dataset1). The three models are trained using dataset1, and the trained machine learning models are directly applied to dataset2 to evaluate and compare their generalization performance. The distribution of SOCD and SOCS in soils of various types and textures is analyzed using the optimal interpolation method. The results indicated that: (1) The average SOC densities predicted by OK interpolation, RF, and SVM are 3.70, 3.74, and 3.63 kg/m

Indexed as

CarbonMachine LearningSoilCarbon SequestrationChinaEnvironmental MonitoringSupport Vector MachineCarbonSoilMappingRandom forest (RF)Soil organic carbon density (SOCD)Soil organic carbon stock (SOCS)Support vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID39607621
PMCPMC11604695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.