ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2024
Mapping surface soil organic carbon density of cultivated land using machine learning in Zhengzhou.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for improving soil carbon sinks and achieving the "double-carbon" goal. This study introduces ten auxiliary variables based on the data from a 2021 land quality survey in Zhengzhou and a multi-objective regional geochemical survey. It uses geostatistical ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation, as well as classical machine learning (ML) models, including random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), to map soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in the topsoil layer (0 - 20 cm) of cultivated land. It partitions the sampling data to assess the generalization capability of the machine learning models, with Zhongmu County designated as an independent test set (dataset2) and the remaining data as the training set (dataset1). The three models are trained using dataset1, and the trained machine learning models are directly applied to dataset2 to evaluate and compare their generalization performance. The distribution of SOCD and SOCS in soils of various types and textures is analyzed using the optimal interpolation method. The results indicated that: (1) The average SOC densities predicted by OK interpolation, RF, and SVM are 3.70, 3.74, and 3.63 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.