Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2025
A Phase 1/2 study of teclistamab, a humanized BCMA × CD3 bispecific Ab in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Infectious toxicities associated with bispecific antibodies and CAR-T Cells in multiple myeloma: a systematic review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Lack of Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies Between Japanese and Non-Japanese Individuals.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Nationwide Retrospective Analysis of the Named Patient Program in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Teclistamab for multiple pulmonary lesions in extramedullary myeloma: first successful case and review of the literature.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Recent Updates and Advancements in the Diagnosis and Management of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.Cureus · 2026Review
- T-cell engagers in cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of bispecific antibody teclistamab versus CAR-T cell therapies in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a retrospective evaluation.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Comprehensive assessment of adverse event profiles associated with bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We characterized the safety and efficacy of the bispecific antibody teclistamab in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Patients were pretreated with a proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb). The primary endpoint was frequency and type of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in phase 1, and overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]) in phase 2. In phase 1, 14 patients received once-weekly (QW) subcutaneous teclistamab (0.72 mg/kg [n = 5]; 1.5 mg/kg [n = 5]; 3 mg/kg [n = 4]). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. As of April 2024, 26 phase-2 patients received the recommended phase-2 dose (QW) (RP2D: 1.5 mg/kg) of teclistamab. Biweekly (Q2W) dosing was allowed after maintaining response for ≥ 6 months. At a median follow-up of 14.32 months, ORR was 76.9% (≥ very good PR: 76.9%; ≥ complete response: 65.4%). Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not reached. Common TEAEs included CRS (grade ≤ 2), neutropenia, and infections. No patient had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and dose reductions. Teclistamab demonstrated deep and durable responses in Japanese patients with RRMM, consistent with the global pivotal MajesTEC-1 study, supporting the potential for a new standard of care for Japanese RRMM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.