ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Ends of the spectrum best practices for early detection and multidisciplinary management of acromegaly.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcromegaly is characterized by an insidious clinical presentation and delayed diagnosis. Longer delays are associated with more comorbidities which can persist after treatment of the growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA). Surgery is the primary therapy of GH-secreting PA, which can lead to durable remission. However, approximately 50% of patients require medical treatment postoperatively. Survival normalizes after achieving biochemical control. This mini-review will address ends of the spectrum challenges in acromegaly, including delayed diagnosis and management of the residual tumor and persistent comorbidities.
methodsWe synthesize relevant literature and present a case of acromegaly that highlights the complexity of clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of persistent acromegaly.
resultsDespite improved biochemical assays, most patients with acromegaly are diagnosed on average five years after initial symptoms. A high index of suspicion does not rely exclusively on acral enlargement, but also a constellation of manifestations and comorbidities suggestive of acromegaly. Medical therapy is required in patients with persistent biochemical disease. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the cornerstone of medical treatment and can be used alone or in combination with dopamine agonists and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Improved options of medical treatment and careful consideration of comorbidities enables individualized patient management. Reoperation and radiation are considered for tumor progression despite medical therapy. In rare cases of resistant and aggressive tumors, neuro-oncology expertise is required.
conclusionsIncreased awareness through education targeting the multifaceted clinical presentation of acromegaly shortens the time to diagnosis and treatment. Multidisciplinary management by specialists increases the likelihood of biochemical and tumor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39607571What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.