Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607563›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Possible muscle-sparing advantage and bodyweight maintenance of laparoscopic gastrectomy for older patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Masayoshi Terayama, Manabu Ohashi, Motonari Ri, Rie Makuuchi, Masaru Hayami, Satoshi Ida, Koshi Kumagai, Takeshi Sano, Souya Nunobe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masayoshi TerayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Manabu OhashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. manabu.ohashi@jfcr.or.jp.
Motonari RiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Rie MakuuchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Masaru HayamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Satoshi IdaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Koshi KumagaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Takeshi SanoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Souya NunobeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is a promising approach for older patients who require less invasive surgery because of their reduced functional reserve and increased comorbidities, with the expansion of its indication to locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the specific benefits of LG in older patients remain unclear. We evaluated whether LG positively influences the postoperative maintenance of skeletal muscle (SM) and bodyweight (BW).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent open gastrectomy (OG) and LG for cStage II or III gastric cancer between 2016 and 2021. After adjustment using propensity score matching, surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups including the postoperative changes of SM index (%SMI) and BW (%BW).

resultsA total of 167 patients who underwent OG (n = 93) and LG (n = 74) were included in the study. After matching, 48 patients in each group were eligible. No significant difference in postoperative complications was observed. Both %SMI and %BW after LG were significantly maintained compared with those after OG during the postoperative first year. LG had consistently positive effects on the maintenance of %SMI and %BW across the prespecified subgroups. Notably, patients with body mass index < 25, performance status 0-1, non-total gastrectomy, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy benefited from LG in the maintenance of %SMI and %BW.

conclusionLG offers greater advantages over OG in maintaining postoperative SM mass as well as BW in patients aged ≥ 75 with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

GastrectomyLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalNeoplasm StagingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdvanced gastric cancerLaparoscopic surgeryOlder patientsSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.