Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607542›Full record

ArticleJA clinical reports2024

Analysis of factors related to anesthetic management affecting acute kidney injury occurring within 72 h after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a historical cohort study.

Seiji Ishikawa, Junko Hirashima, Makiko Hiroyama, Shojiro Ozato, Masayuki Watanabe, Katsuyuki Terajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JA clinical reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seiji IshikawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. seiji.ishikawa.juntendo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5044-7789
Junko HirashimaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Makiko HiroyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Shojiro OzatoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Masayuki WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Katsuyuki TerajimaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of factors related to anesthetic management, including anesthesia methods and infusion volume, on acute kidney injury (AKI) after esophagectomy have not been thoroughly investigated.

methodsA historical cohort study of patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2008 and December 2022 was conducted. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria within 72 h after esophagectomy. Logistic regression was used to model the association between perioperative factors, including factors related to anesthetic management, and postoperative AKI.

resultsOf 1005 patients, 48 patients (4.8%) had AKI (40 stage 1 and 8 stage 2). AKI patients were older (67.8 vs. 65.0 years, P = 0.046) and more likely to have hypertension (72.9 vs. 37.9%, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (39.6 vs. 14.3%, P < 0.0001), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (12.5 vs. 3.4%, P = 0.0085), and longer duration of anesthesia (518 vs. 490 min, P = 0.0058) than non-AKI patients. AKI patients were less likely to have epidural anesthesia (72.9 vs. 91.5%, P < 0.001). The distribution of inhaled anesthetics chosen was not significantly different between AKI and non-AKI patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, AKI was associated with the Brinkman index (per 100 units, odds ratio (OR) = 1.06), hypertension (OR = 3.39), chronic kidney disease (OR = 2.58), duration of anesthesia (per 10 min, OR = 1.03), epidural anesthesia (OR = 0.35) and RBC transfusion (OR = 3.27).

conclusionsExcept for epidural anesthesia, no significant association was found between AKI and factors related to anesthetic management. Epidural anesthesia may protect against early postoperative AKI in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryEpidural anesthesiaEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyPostoperative complicationRenal protectionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39607542
PMCPMC11604913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.