SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2025
Impact of Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia on Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catheter-Based Sacral Nerve Block Versus Pudendal Nerve Block in the Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Trial
- [Image-guided plexus and peripheral nerve blocks in modern multimodal pain management].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The Diagnosis and Management of Pudendal Neuralgia.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Developing the FIGO-IPPS "R U MOVVING SOMe" classification system for female chronic pelvic pain.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- The Golden Year? Early Intervention Yields Superior Outcomes in Chronic Pelvic Pain with Pudendal Neuralgia: A Comparative Analysis of Early vs. Delayed Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPudendal neuralgia is chronic pelvic pain associated with the pudendal nerve. Unfortunately, the best treatment approach is unknown. Our objective was to systematically assess interventions for pudendal neuralgia for improvement in pain.
methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we retrieved studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov through May 27, 2024. Our population included patients with pudendal neuralgia. Our interventions included surgery (decompression and nerve stimulation), injections and pulse radiofrequency treatments. Outcomes included improvement in pain (usually on a visual analog scale (VAS)) and adverse events. GRADE criteria were used to assess quality. Differences between pre- and post-intervention pain scores were compared with a random effects REML model and reported as mean difference and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsSix hundred eighty-seven abstracts were screened yielding 37 studies that met eligibility criteria. Treatments included 16 surgeries with 12 nerve decompressions and 4 nerve stimulator placements, 14 injections, and 7 pulse radiofrequency treatments. The majority, 95%, were Grade C. All treatments appear to provide relief to a similar extent (mean difference in VAS of 2.73 cm (1.77, 3.69), p < 0.07, with high heterogeneity I
conclusionsThere are many treatment approaches to pudendal neuralgia, but overall, the evidence includes heterogeneous patient populations, non-standardized treatments, poor-quality studies, variable pain measurement instruments, and short-term follow-up. All interventions improved pain with no statistically significant difference between groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39607531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.