Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607531›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2025

Impact of Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia on Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sarah E Andiman, Julia S Maron, Vani Dandolu, Elizabeth Drugge, Ryan P Cosgro, MegAnne M Vasey, Gregory C Spaulding, Francesca Ricciardi, Gagana Yaskhi, Catherine A Toal and 12 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Developing the FIGO-IPPS "R U MOVVING SOMe" classification system for female chronic pelvic pain.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sarah E AndimanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. sarah.andiman@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-7010
Julia S MaronNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Vani DandoluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Metropolitan Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth DruggeDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Ryan P CosgroNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
MegAnne M VaseyNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Gregory C SpauldingNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Francesca RicciardiNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Gagana YaskhiNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Catherine A ToalNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Juliet E ShatkinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Devora Loike-WeinsteinNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Sumaita MahmoodNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Mikaela F GlassNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Dena PhillipsNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Michelle SciarrinoNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Ashley J SacksNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
David BaruchNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Michelle CohenNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Audrey HuangNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Bracha L PollackNew York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Cara L GrimesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPudendal neuralgia is chronic pelvic pain associated with the pudendal nerve. Unfortunately, the best treatment approach is unknown. Our objective was to systematically assess interventions for pudendal neuralgia for improvement in pain.

methodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we retrieved studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov through May 27, 2024. Our population included patients with pudendal neuralgia. Our interventions included surgery (decompression and nerve stimulation), injections and pulse radiofrequency treatments. Outcomes included improvement in pain (usually on a visual analog scale (VAS)) and adverse events. GRADE criteria were used to assess quality. Differences between pre- and post-intervention pain scores were compared with a random effects REML model and reported as mean difference and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsSix hundred eighty-seven abstracts were screened yielding 37 studies that met eligibility criteria. Treatments included 16 surgeries with 12 nerve decompressions and 4 nerve stimulator placements, 14 injections, and 7 pulse radiofrequency treatments. The majority, 95%, were Grade C. All treatments appear to provide relief to a similar extent (mean difference in VAS of 2.73 cm (1.77, 3.69), p < 0.07, with high heterogeneity I

conclusionsThere are many treatment approaches to pudendal neuralgia, but overall, the evidence includes heterogeneous patient populations, non-standardized treatments, poor-quality studies, variable pain measurement instruments, and short-term follow-up. All interventions improved pain with no statistically significant difference between groups.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPelvic PainPudendal NeuralgiaDecompression, SurgicalElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPudendal NervePulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentTreatment OutcomeInjectionNantes criteriaNerve blockNerve decompressionPainPudendal neuralgiaPulse radiofrequencyTreatmentVAS score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.