SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2024
An examination of seizure-free outcome and visual field deficits: Anterior temporal lobectomy versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy for temporal lobe epilepsy-a systematic review and meta-analysis for comprehensive understanding.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative predictors of seizure outcomes after epilepsy surgery for mesial temporal sclerosis: A systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Voxel-based morphometry in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: an exploratory Moroccan pilot study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study compares Selective Amygdalohippocampectomy (SAHE) and Anterior Temporal Lobectomy (ATL) for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), focusing on seizure control and visual field deficits (VFD). While previous research suggests potential benefits of SAHE, this meta-analysis aims to clarify the comparative effectiveness of bothprocedures.
methodsThis study adhered to PRISMA guidelines, comparing seizure outcomes and VFDs between SAHE and ATL for temporal lobe epilepsy. Comprehensive data extraction and meta-analysis revealed comparable efficacy, with SAHE potentially offering advantages in VFD risk reduction. Quality assessment ensured methodological rigor.
results29 studies comparing SAHE and ATL for TLE. Seizure freedom analysis encompassed 23 studies (n = 3238), showing no significant difference between SAHE and ATL (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.89-1.03, P = 0.26). SAHE exhibited significantly lower visual field deficits (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.97, P = 0.01). Subgroup analyses highlighted differences between transsylvian SAHE and ATL but not transcortical SAHE. No significant difference was found in seizure freedom between SAHE and ATL in patients with hippocampal sclerosis.
conclusionsATL is more effective than transsylvian SAHE in achieving seizure freedom. However, no significant difference in seizure freedom was observed between transcortical SAHE and ATL. There were no notable differences in seizure outcomes between the two techniques in patients with hippocampal sclerosis. In contrast, SAHE carries a lower risk of postoperative visual field deficits compared to ATL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39607527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.