ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2025
Anti-integrin αvβ6 antibody as a biomarker for diagnosing ulcerative colitis: a nationwide multicenter validation study.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of anti-integrin αvβ6 in ulcerative colitis: a diagnostic meta-analysis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- UC-associated autoantibodies to αvβ6 inhibit mucosal TGFβ activation and predispose to intestinal inflammation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Anti-Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibodies Predict Response and Treatment Persistence to Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Characteristics of anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies in patients with ulcerative colitis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Clinical Value of Anti-Integrin αvβ6 Antibody Serum-Level Measurement in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Differences in Anti-αvβ6 Integrin Antibody Expression between U.S. and Japanese Cohorts in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Article
- Serological Remission Defined by Anti-Integrin αvβ6 Antibody Predicts Long-Term Clinical Remission of Ulcerative Colitis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Autoantibodies in Ulcerative Colitis.European journal of immunology · 2025Review
- Antibodies against integrin αvβ6 have high diagnostic accuracy for ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA serum biomarker for diagnosing ulcerative colitis (UC) remains to be established. Although we recently reported an anti-integrin αvβ6 antibody (V6 Ab) for diagnosing UC with high sensitivity and specificity, no large-scale validation study exists. This study aimed to validate the diagnostic value of V6 Ab for UC using a nationwide multicenter cohort study.
methodsWe measured V6 Ab titers in patients definitively diagnosed with UC, Crohn's disease (CD), or other gastrointestinal disorders (OGDs). The primary outcome was the diagnostic value of V6 Ab. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with false-negative results in patients with UC and false-positive results in patients without UC and the heterogeneity of the diagnostic value of V6 Ab among the participating facilities.
resultsWe enrolled 1241, 796, and 206 patients with UC, CD, and OGD, respectively, from 28 Japanese high-volume referral centers. The diagnostic sensitivity of V6 Ab for UC was 87.7%, and its specificities for CD and OGDs were 82.0% and 87.4%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that false-negative results were associated with older age at the time of sample collection, current smokers, lower partial Mayo score, and not receiving advanced therapies in patients with UC, and false-positive results were associated with colonic CD in patients with CD. No factor was associated with false-positive results in patients with OGDs. There were no significant differences in the diagnostic value of V6 Ab among the centers.
conclusionsThe diagnostic value of V6 Ab for UC was validated in the large-scale nationwide multicenter study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.