Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607370›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2024

An In Vivo Assessment of Different Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Tissue Types and Their Differentiation State on a Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold for Bone Regeneration.

Teja Guda, Jessica M Stukel Shah, Bridney D Lundquist, Joseph M Macaitis, Mística Lozano Pérez, Michaela R Pfau-Cloud, Felipe O Beltran, Connie W Schmitt, Emily M Corbin, Melissa A Grunlan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Histopathological Analysis of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Osteogenic Derivatives in Promoting Bone Regeneration in a Model of Fracture Nonunion.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Teja GudaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Jessica M Stukel ShahNaval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Bridney D LundquistNaval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Joseph M MacaitisNaval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Mística Lozano PérezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Michaela R Pfau-CloudDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Felipe O BeltranDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Connie W SchmittAir Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Airman Systems Directorate, Bioeffects Division, Veterinary Science Branch, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Emily M CorbinAir Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Airman Systems Directorate, Bioeffects Division, Veterinary Science Branch, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Melissa A GrunlanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Wen LienUSAF Dental Research & Consultation Service, San Antonio, USA.
Heuy-Ching WangNaval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Alexander J BurdetteNaval Medical Research Unit San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8208-2999

Funding

UTSA RISE Research Training ProgramR25GM060655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI BAREA-RODRIGUEZ, EDWIN J · 2000 to 2022
$21.6M
Air Force 59th Medical Wing Chief Scientist's Office, work unit number G1618NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A combined biomaterial and cell-based solution to heal critical size bone defects in the craniomaxillofacial area is a promising alternative therapeutic option to improve upon autografting, the current gold standard. A shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffold, composed of biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) and coated with bioactive polydopamine, was evaluated with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from adipose (ADSC), bone marrow (BMSC), or umbilical cord (UCSC) tissue in their undifferentiated state or pre-differentiated toward osteoblasts for bone healing in a rat calvarial defect model. Pre-differentiating ADSCs and UCSCs resulted in higher new bone volume fraction (15.69% ± 1.64%) compared to empty (i.e., untreated) defects and scaffold-only (i.e., unseeded) groups (4.41% ± 1.11%). Notably, only differentiated UCSCs exhibited a significant increase in new bone volume, surpassing both undifferentiated UCSCs and unseeded scaffolds. Further, differentiated ADSCs and UCSCs had significantly higher trabecular numbers than their undifferentiated counterparts, unseeded scaffolds, and untreated defects. Although the mineral density regenerated within the unseeded scaffold surpassed that achieved with cell seeding, the connectivity of this bone was diminished, as the regenerated tissue confined itself to the spherical morphology of the scaffold pores. The SMP scaffold alone, with undifferentiated BMSCs, with undifferentiated and differentiated ADSCs, and differentiated UCSCs (29.72 ± 1.49 N) demonstrated significant osseointegration compared to empty defects (14.34 ± 2.21 N) after 12 weeks of healing when assessed by mechanical push-out testing. Based on these results and tissue availability to obtain the cells, pre-differentiated ADSCs and UCSCs emerge as particularly promising candidates when paired with the SMP scaffold for repairing critical size bone defects in the craniofacial skeleton.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationCell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem CellsPolyestersPolymersTissue ScaffoldsAdipose TissueAnimalsHumansIndolesMaleOsteogenesisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySkullIndolespolycaprolactonepolydopaminePolyestersPolymersbonecritical size defectdifferentiationmesenchymal stromal cellpoly(ε‐caprolactone)shape memory polymer

Identifiers

PMID39607370
PMCPMC12228113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.