Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607316›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2025

Flow Rate Determination of the Nanoflow Sheath Liquid CE-MS-Coupling Applying the nanoCEasy Interface.

Alisa Höchsmann, Jasmin Schairer, Oliver Schott, Ralf Höneise, Christian Neusüß

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alisa HöchsmannFaculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.
Jasmin SchairerFaculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.
Oliver SchottFaculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.
Ralf HöneiseFaculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.
Christian NeusüßFaculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-4924

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE92-0021-01the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) 446330632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, nanoflow sheath liquid (nanoSL) interfaces have been used more commonly for capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) coupling due to their high sensitivity combined with flexibility in CE separation conditions. So far, the exact amount of sheath liquid (SL) and, thus, the dilution effect remain unknown due to the self-supplying type of the nanoSL interfaces. To quantify the SL flow rates, we present here an approach for the determination of the flow rate based on isotopically labeled standards using the nanoCEasy interface. SL and pumped CE flow are spiked with atrazine and d5-atrazine, respectively, enabling the determination of the total flow rate for different electrospray (ES) conditions. Generally, flow rates increase with higher ES voltages. Only at high ES voltages, larger emitter sizes lead to higher flow rates; for low voltages, flow rates are independent of emitter size. Additionally, smaller emitter sizes can generally be operated at lower ES voltages. Visualizing the ES, higher flow rates lead to a larger spray angle. Higher flow rates may decrease the signal intensity by diluting the CE-separated analytes. Indeed, this effect is observed for the flow-injected atrazine analytes and in the CE-MS analysis of an amino acid standard mix under aqueous acidic separation conditions. Therefore, lower flow rates are preferred for low electroosmotic flow (EOF) applications. However, in high EOF applications, higher voltages are required to prevent the accumulation of aqueous background electrolyte (BGE) at the emitter tip, which otherwise leads to peak broadening and inefficient ionization. Overall, the presented data enable the selection of stable and sensitive settings for nanoSL interfaces.

Indexed as

AtrazineNanotechnologyMass SpectrometryAtrazinecapillary electrophoresisflow rate determinationisotopically labeled standardsmass spectrometrynanoCEasy

Identifiers

PMID39607316
PMCPMC12449746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.