Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607308›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2024

Risk-Based Decision Making: Estimands for Sequential Prediction Under Interventions.

Kim Luijken, Paweł Morzywołek, Wouter van Amsterdam, Giovanni Cinà, Jeroen Hoogland, Ruth Keogh, Jesse H Krijthe, Sara Magliacane, Thijs van Ommen, Niels Peek and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kim LuijkenDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Paweł MorzywołekDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter van AmsterdamDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Giovanni CinàDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeroen HooglandDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-6052
Ruth KeoghDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-3253
Jesse H KrijthePattern Recognition and Bio-Informatics Group, EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Sara MagliacaneAmsterdam Machine Learning Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thijs van OmmenDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Niels PeekDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Hein PutterDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5395-1422
Maarten van SmedenDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Matthew SperrinDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Junfeng WangDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Daniala L WeirDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vanessa DidelezDepartment of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-7706
Nan van GelovenDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-9093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction models are used among others to inform medical decisions on interventions. Typically, individuals with high risks of adverse outcomes are advised to undergo an intervention while those at low risk are advised to refrain from it. Standard prediction models do not always provide risks that are relevant to inform such decisions: for example, an individual may be estimated to be at low risk because similar individuals in the past received an intervention which lowered their risk. Therefore, prediction models supporting decisions should target risks belonging to defined intervention strategies. Previous works on prediction under interventions assumed that the prediction model was used only at one time point to make an intervention decision. In clinical practice, intervention decisions are rarely made only once: they might be repeated, deferred, and reevaluated. This requires estimated risks under interventions that can be reconsidered at several potential decision moments. In the current work, we highlight key considerations for formulating estimands in sequential prediction under interventions that can inform such intervention decisions. We illustrate these considerations by giving examples of estimands for a case study about choosing between vaginal delivery and cesarean section for women giving birth. Our formalization of prediction tasks in a sequential, causal, and estimand context provides guidance for future studies to ensure that the right question is answered and appropriate causal estimation approaches are chosen to develop sequential prediction models that can inform intervention decisions.

Indexed as

BiometryModels, StatisticalDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyRiskRisk Assessmentcounterfactual predictionestimandprediction modelprediction under interventions

Identifiers

PMID39607308
PMCPMC11604027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.