Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607307›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2024

Domain Selection for Gaussian Process Data: An Application to Electrocardiogram Signals.

Nicolás Hernández, Gabriel Martos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicolás HernándezSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-5652
Gabriel MartosDepartamento de Matemática y Estadística, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian processes and the Kullback-Leibler divergence have been deeply studied in statistics and machine learning. This paper marries these two concepts and introduce the local Kullback-Leibler divergence to learn about intervals where two Gaussian processes differ the most. We address subtleties entailed in the estimation of local divergences and the corresponding interval of local maximum divergence as well. The estimation performance and the numerical efficiency of the proposed method are showcased via a Monte Carlo simulation study. In a medical research context, we assess the potential of the devised tools in the analysis of electrocardiogram signals.

Indexed as

BiometryElectrocardiographyHumansMonte Carlo MethodNormal DistributionSignal Processing, Computer-Assisteddomain selectionelectrocardiogram signalsGaussian processesintervals of local maximum divergenceKullback–Leibler divergence

Identifiers

PMID39607307
PMCPMC11604031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.