Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607286›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2025

Enhancing multisensory rehabilitation of visual field defects with transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized clinical trial.

Lorenzo Diana, Carlotta Casati, Lisa Melzi, Stefania Bianchi Marzoli, Nadia Bolognini

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06116760 (Anodal tDCS With Compensatory Audio-visual Training for Acquired Visual Field Defects After Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06116760 nacompletednot on this map

Anodal tDCS With Compensatory Audio-visual Training for Acquired Visual Field Defects After Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Auxologico ItalianoRan2016 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsStroke, Hemianopsia, HomonymousArmsAnodal or sham tDCS, Audio-visual training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorenzo DianaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-5311
Carlotta CasatiDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Lisa MelziNeuro-Ophthalmology Center and Ocular Electrophysiology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Stefania Bianchi MarzoliNeuro-Ophthalmology Center and Ocular Electrophysiology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Nadia BologniniDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health - Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeVisual rehabilitation is necessary for improving the quality of life of patients with acquired homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). By modulating brain excitability and plasticity, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may accelerate and increase the effects of compensatory trainings, which are usually long and intensive. In the present proof-of-principle, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we assess whether anodal tDCS applied over ipsilesional occipital or parietal cortices can increase the effects of a compensatory audiovisual training for HVFDs.

methodsEighteen participants with chronic HVFDs were randomized to receive anodal or sham tDCS over the ipsilesional parietal or occipital cortex during a 2-week (10 days, 2 h/day) audiovisual treatment aimed at improving oculomotor visual field exploration. Improvements were assessed by administering visual detection with eye movements and visual search tests, and a questionnaire for activities of daily living (ADLs) before the treatment, at its end, and at 1-month and 4-month follow-ups; lesion analyses were performed to look for predictors of treatment effects.

resultsAnodal ipsilesional tDCS, regardless of the target area (occipital vs. parietal), speeds up and increases daily improvements during the training. Whereas long-lasting (up to 4 months) post-treatment improvements in visual search and ADLs were observed in all groups, a greater and stable increase of visual detections in the blind hemifield was brought about only by the adjuvant use of occipital tDCS.

conclusionsCompensatory audiovisual rehabilitation of HFVDs is effective and benefits from the adjuvant application of occipital and parietal tDCS, which speeds up and increases training-induced improvement. REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT06116760.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationVisual FieldsActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemianopsiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccipital LobeParietal LobeTreatment Outcomehemianopiarehabilitationstroketranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39607286
PMCPMC11625917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.