Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607250›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2024

Fish: a new xenograft source for maxillary sinus lifting.

Emrah Soylu, Musab Süleyman Kilavuz, Fatih Duman, Hasan Ekeer, Zeynep Burçin Gönen, Beyza Kahraman, Arzu Hanım Yay, Demet Bolat

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emrah SoyluErciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and DentBioChem Biotechnology Co., Erciyes Teknopark, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9828-5096
Musab Süleyman KilavuzErciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and DentBioChem Biotechnology Co., Erciyes Teknopark, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Fatih DumanErciyes University, Faculty of Science, Department of Hydrobiology, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Hasan EkeerBiologist, Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Research Laboratory, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Zeynep Burçin GönenErciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and DentBioChem Biotechnology Co., Erciyes Teknopark, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Beyza KahramanErciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and DentBioChem Biotechnology Co., Erciyes Teknopark, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Arzu Hanım YayErciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Demet BolatErciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Kayseri, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough autogenous grafting is accepted as the gold standard in intraoral grafting, xenogenous grafts are frequently used in sinus lift surgeries due to their osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fish spine-derived xenogenic grafts in sinus augmentation surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, a fish spine-derived xenogenic graft was produced for comparison with autogenous graft and bovine derived xenogenic grafts. Twenty-one New Zealand rabbits were used. Autogenous grafts (AG- Group 1), as well as bovine-derived (bHAP - Group 2) and fish spine-derived (fHAP - Group 3) xenogenic grafts were placed in the right and left sinuses of rabbits. The animals were sacrificed at the 4th and 8th weeks. New bone formation (NBF) was evaluated through histological examination, while bone volume (BV), new bone surface/bone volume (BS-BV), new bone surface/tissue volume (BS-TV), and trabecular separation (Tb-Sp) were assessed via Micro-CT. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05.

resultsHistological examination revealed a significant difference in NBF between AG-bHAP (p<0.001), as well as between fHAP-bHAP (p<0.001) in the fourth-week group. No significant difference was found in the eighth-week group (p=0.130). In the eighth-week group, a statistically significant difference was found between fHAP and bHAP in terms of BV. (p=0.007).

conclusionAlthough both graft materials used in this study showed positive effects on bone regeneration, fHAP and AG presented similar effects on bone regeneration and were superior to bHAP.

Indexed as

HeterograftsMaxillary SinusOsteogenesisSinus Floor AugmentationX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsBone RegenerationBone TransplantationCattleFishesMaleRabbitsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsStatistics, NonparametricTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39607250
PMCPMC11643101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.