ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2024
Educational technology to support patient safety in the operating room: clinical simulation guides.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication skills and organizational silence as predictors of perioperative competence in operating room nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Implementation strategies by leaders and health professionals to improve the safety climate in the operating room: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to develop and validate two clinical simulation guides to support and disseminate a culture of safety in the surgical environment. methodological study supported by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning theoretical framework. The snowball technique was used to validate the clinical guidelines with experts on the subject. Two scales validated for Brazil were used for the pilot test. 89 operating room professionals took part, including 41 doctors, 40 nursing technicians, four nurses, two radiology technicians, and two nursing trainees. Two guides were created, one on conflict management and teamwork in patient safety during the transfer of the patient from the operating room to the post-anesthetic recovery room, and the other dealing with the assistance of the healthcare team in the transfer of care in the post-anesthetic recovery room. The evaluation of Satisfaction with Simulated Clinical Experiences had an average score of 8.3 and Satisfaction and Self-confidence in learning 4.1. the guides have been validated and are suitable for replication in any surgical environment. We believe that this technology could contribute to improving the safety culture in the operating room by providing an opportunity for reflection and critical thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.