Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39607055›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

The Iatrogenic Consequences of Medicalising Grief: Resetting the Research Agenda.

Sarah Gurley-Green, Lisa Cosgrove, Milutin Kostic, Lauren Koa, Susan McPherson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Gurley-GreenUniversity of Massachusetts, Counseling and Psychology, BEAHR Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3702-4567
Lisa CosgroveUniversity of Massachusetts, Counseling and Psychology, BEAHR Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Milutin KosticDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia.
Lauren KoaUniversity of Essex, School of Health and Social Care, Deputy Director of IPHW, Colchester, UK.
Susan McPhersonUniversity of Massachusetts, Counseling and Psychology, BEAHR Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-9932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was published in 2013, there was a firestorm of controversy about the elimination of the bereavement exclusion. Proponents of this change and of the proposed "complicated grief" designation believed that this change would help clinicians recognise major depression in the context of recent bereavement. Other researchers and clinicians have raised concerns about medicalising grief. In 2022 "prolonged grief disorder" (PGD) was officially included in the DSM-5-TR in the trauma- and stressor-related disorders section. Not surprisingly, there has been a push to identify biomarkers and to use neuroimaging to identify the neurobiological basis of PGD. Some researchers have even suggested that PGD is a 'reward circuit disorder' akin to addiction and that naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, may be a promising treatment. The purpose of this paper is to show how medicalising grief reinforces a research agenda dedicated to the search for pharmaceutical and psychological 'magic bullets.' Following George and Whitehouse (2021), we propose that an ecopsychosocial approach-one that incorporates environmental and contextual factors-is needed.

Indexed as

GriefIatrogenic DiseaseMedicalizationBereavementDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumans

Identifiers

PMID39607055
PMCPMC11849443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.