ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Quality of life and quality of sleep in health professionals working in critical areas.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency rooms and intensive care units in hospitals are physically and mentally stressful for health personnel and can negatively affect them. Objectives: To evaluate and to compare the quality of life and quality of sleep of emergency room and intensive care unit personnel. Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study conducted with 117 civil servants, including physicians, nurses, and licensed practical nurses. Sociodemographic questionnaires, the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument-Abbreviated version, the Pittsburgh Quality Sleep Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale questionnaire were used. Results: The quality of sleep in women was worse than in men. Physicians scored lower in the psychological domain of quality of life than nurses. When the group of physicians was stratified between clinicians and surgeons, clinicians scored better in the physical domain and worse in the social relations and overall quality of life domains. Conclusions: The results showed that the psychological domain in nurses was less impaired than in physicians. Women also had poorer quality of sleep and were more likely to suffer from sleep disorders than men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.