Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606729›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Finding high posterior density phylogenies by systematically extending a directed acyclic graph.

Chris Jennings-Shaffer, David H Rich, Matthew Macaulay, Michael D Karcher, Tanvi Ganapathy, Shosuke Kiami, Anna Kooperberg, Cheng Zhang, Marc A Suchard, Frederick A Matsen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chris Jennings-ShafferPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David H RichPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Matthew MacaulayUniversity of Technology Sydney, Australian Institute for Microbiology & Infection, Sydney, Australia.
Michael D KarcherDepartment of Math & Computer Science, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tanvi GanapathyPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Shosuke KiamiPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Anna KooperbergPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cheng ZhangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Marc A SuchardDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Frederick A MatsenPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Fast and flexible Bayesian phylogenetics via modern machine learningR01AI162611 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MATSEN, FREDERICK ALBERT · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
High-Performance Compute Cluster for Comprehensive Cancer and Infectious Diseases ResearchS10OD028685 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRADLEY, PHILIP · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162611NIH HHS S10 OD028685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian phylogenetics typically estimates a posterior distribution, or aspects thereof, using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. These methods integrate over tree space by applying local rearrangements to move a tree through its space as a random walk. Previous work explored the possibility of replacing this random walk with a systematic search, but was quickly overwhelmed by the large number of probable trees in the posterior distribution. In this paper we develop methods to sidestep this problem using a recently introduced structure called the subsplit directed acyclic graph (sDAG). This structure can represent many trees at once, and local rearrangements of trees translate to methods of enlarging the sDAG. Here we propose two methods of introducing, ranking, and selecting local rearrangements on sDAGs to produce a collection of trees with high posterior density. One of these methods successfully recovers the set of high posterior density trees across a range of data sets. However, we find that a simpler strategy of aggregating trees into an sDAG in fact is computationally faster and returns a higher fraction of probable trees.

Identifiers

PMID39606729
PMCPMC11601806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.