Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606717›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

MICCAI-CDMRI 2023 QuantConn Challenge Findings on Achieving Robust Quantitative Connectivity through Harmonized Preprocessing of Diffusion MRI.

Nancy R Newlin, Kurt Schilling, Serge Koudoro, Bramsh Qamar Chandio, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Daniel Moyer, Claire E Kelly, Sila Genc, Jian Chen, Joseph Yuan-Mou Yang and 26 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Updated by
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Nancy R NewlinDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Kurt SchillingDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Serge KoudoroIndiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN.
Bramsh Qamar ChandioMark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Praitayini KanakarajDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Daniel MoyerDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Claire E KellyDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Sila GencDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Jian ChenDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Joseph Yuan-Mou YangDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Ye WuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Yifei HeSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Jiawei ZhangCollege of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Qingrun ZengSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Fan ZhangSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Nagesh AdluruWaisman Center, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Vishwesh NathNVIDIA, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sudhir PathakLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Walter SchneiderLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Anurag GadeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.
Yogesh RathiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Tom HendriksDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.
Anna VilanovaDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.
Maxime ChamberlandDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.
Tomasz PieciakLPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain.
Dominika CiupekSano Centre for Computational Medicine, 30-054 Kraków, Poland.
Antonio Tristán VegaLPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain.
Santiago Aja-FernándezLPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain.
Maciej MalawskiSano Centre for Computational Medicine, 30-054 Kraków, Poland.
Gani OuedraogoAix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Julia MachnioSano Centre for Computational Medicine, 30-054 Kraków, Poland.
Christian EwertAI in Medical Imaging, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE).
Paul M ThompsonMark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Neda JahanshadMark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.
Eleftherios GaryfallidisIndiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Brittany Gail Travers · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Harmonizing multi-site diffusion MRI acquisitions for neuroscientific analysis across ages and brain disordersR01MH119222 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI O'DONNELL, LAUREN JEAN, RATHI, YOGESH · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Stroke Connectome MRI Biomarkers for VCID Risk AssessmentR01NS123378 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nagesh Adluru, Veena A Nair · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
FiberNET: Deep learning to evaluate brain tract integrity worldwide and in ADRF1AG057892 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Global studies into the Genetic Architecture of the Brain's White Matter Network through Harmonized and Coordinated Analyses in the ENIGMA-ConsortiumR01MH134004 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Neda Jahanshad · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Genetic influences on the brain: A twin imaging studyR01HD050735 · NICHD · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WRIGHT, MARGARET JANE · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Microstructure and connectivity modeling from the cortex to the spinal cord in Multiple SclerosisK01EB032898 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHILLING, KURT G · 2022 to 2025
$630k
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057892NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB032898NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050735NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119222NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134004NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White matter alterations are increasingly implicated in neurological diseases and their progression. International-scale studies use diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to qualitatively identify changes in white matter microstructure and connectivity. Yet, quantitative analysis of DW-MRI data is hindered by inconsistencies stemming from varying acquisition protocols. Specifically, there is a pressing need to harmonize the preprocessing of DW-MRI datasets to ensure the derivation of robust quantitative diffusion metrics across acquisitions. In the MICCAI-CDMRI 2023 QuantConn challenge, participants were provided raw data from the same individuals collected on the same scanner but with two different acquisitions and tasked with preprocessing the DW-MRI to minimize acquisition differences while retaining biological variation. Harmonized submissions are evaluated on the reproducibility and comparability of cross-acquisition bundle-wise microstructure measures, bundle shape features, and connectomics. The key innovations of the QuantConn challenge are that (1) we assess bundles and tractography in the context of harmonization for the first time, (2) we assess connectomics in the context of harmonization for the first time, and (3) we have 10x additional subjects over prior harmonization challenge, MUSHAC and 100x over SuperMUDI. We find that bundle surface area, fractional anisotropy, connectome assortativity, betweenness centrality, edge count, modularity, nodal strength, and participation coefficient measures are most biased by acquisition and that machine learning voxel-wise correction, RISH mapping, and NeSH methods effectively reduce these biases. In addition, microstructure measures AD, MD, RD, bundle length, connectome density, efficiency, and path length are least biased by these acquisition differences. A machine learning approach that learned voxel-wise cross-acquisition relationships was the most effective at harmonizing connectomic, microstructure, and macrostructure features, but requires the same subject be scanned at each site co-registered. NeSH, a spatial and angular resampling method, was also effective and has generalizable framework not reliant co-registration. Our code is available at https://github.com/nancynewlin-masi/QuantConn/.

Indexed as

connectomicsDiffusion MRIharmonizationimage processingtractographytractometry

Identifiers

PMID39606717
PMCPMC11601790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.