Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606709›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2024

SI-MIL: Taming Deep MIL for Self-Interpretability in Gigapixel Histopathology.

Saarthak Kapse, Pushpak Pati, Srijan Das, Jingwei Zhang, Chao Chen, Maria Vakalopoulou, Joel Saltz, Dimitris Samaras, Rajarsi R Gupta, Prateek Prasanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Topological Comparison of the Fluorescence Imitating Brightfield Imaging and H&E Imaging.Topology- and graph-informed imaging informatics : first International Workshop, TGI3 2024, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 10, 2024, Proceedings. International Workshop on Topology- and Graph-Informed ... · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saarthak KapseStony Brook University, USA.
Pushpak PatiIndependent Researcher.
Srijan DasUNC Charlotte, USA.
Jingwei ZhangStony Brook University, USA.
Chao ChenStony Brook University, USA.
Maria VakalopoulouCentraleSupélec, University of Paris-Saclay, France.
Joel SaltzStony Brook University, USA.
Dimitris SamarasStony Brook University, USA.
Rajarsi R GuptaStony Brook University, USA.
Prateek PrasannaStony Brook University, USA.

Funding

TCIA Sustainment and Scalability - Platforms for Quantitative Imaging Informatics in Precision MedicineU24CA215109 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BANERJEE, IMON, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$8.5M
IMAT-ITCR Collaboration: Combining FIBI and topological data analysis: Synergistic approaches for tumor structural microenvironment explorationR21CA258493 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CHEN, CHAO, PRASANNA, PRATEEK · 2022 to 2023
$467k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA258493NCI NIH HHS U24 CA215109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing interpretability and reasoning into Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) methods for Whole Slide Image (WSI) analysis is challenging, given the complexity of gigapixel slides. Traditionally, MIL interpretability is limited to identifying salient regions deemed pertinent for downstream tasks, offering little insight to the end-user (pathologist) regarding the rationale behind these selections. To address this, we propose Self-Interpretable MIL (SI-MIL), a method intrinsically designed for interpretability from the very outset. SI-MIL employs a deep MIL framework to guide an interpretable branch grounded on handcrafted pathological features, facilitating linear predictions. Beyond identifying salient regions, SI-MIL uniquely provides feature-level interpretations rooted in pathological insights for WSIs. Notably, SI-MIL, with its linear prediction constraints, challenges the prevalent myth of an inevitable trade-off between model interpretability and performance, demonstrating competitive results compared to state-of-the-art methods on WSI-level prediction tasks across three cancer types. In addition, we thoroughly benchmark the local-and global-interpretability of SI-MIL in terms of statistical analysis, a domain expert study, and desiderata of interpretability, namely, user-friendliness and faithfulness.

Identifiers

PMID39606709
PMCPMC11601081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.