ReviewFrontiers in neurology2024
Progress in treatment of pathological neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arachidonic acid metabolism in spinal cord injury.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Dapsone and N-Acetylcysteine Exert a Synergistic Antinociceptive Effect Associated with Oxidative Stress After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: An Isobolographic Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Mas-Related G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: Emerging Roles in Neuropathic Pain.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions on Neuropathic Pain in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Nanozymes in neuropathic pain: strategies bridging oxidative stress, mitochondrial repair, and neuroimmune modulation for targeted therapy.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
- Microalgae and exercise: from molecular mechanisms and brain health to clinical perspectives in the context of 3P medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathological neuropathic pain is a common complication following spinal cord injury. Due to its high incidence, prolonged duration, tenacity, and limited therapeutic efficacy, it has garnered increasing attention from both basic researchers and clinicians. The pathogenesis of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is multifaceted, involving factors such as structural and functional alterations of the central nervous system, pain signal transduction, and inflammatory effects, posing significant challenges to clinical management. Currently, drugs commonly employed in treating spinal cord injury induced neuropathic pain include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. However, a subset of patients often experiences suboptimal therapeutic responses or severe adverse reactions. Therefore, emerging treatments are emphasizing a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to enhance neuropathic pain management. We provide a comprehensive review of past literature, which aims to aim both the mechanisms and clinical interventions for pathological neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury, offering novel insights for basic science research and clinical practice in spinal cord injury treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.