ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Parental attitudes and perceptions towards the recruitment of children to clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parental motivations, facilitators, and barriers to participating in a pediatric vaccine trial in Kathmandu, Nepal: A qualitative study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials (CTs) in children are critical for understanding and treating childhood diseases. However, there trials require prior permission from parents. We evaluated parental attitudes and perceptions regarding the recruitment of their children in CTs. Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey questionnaire targeting parents of children admitted to the neonatal and pediatric departments in two tertiary hospitals in Qatar. The survey was administered by investigators and was composed of two domains to assess the knowledge and attitude of parents regarding children's enrollment in CTs, in addition to the participant's demographics domain. Results: Of the 167 questionnaires offered to parents, we received a total of 138 responses, resulting in a response rate of 82.6%, with the majority being women (72%). Many parents (75%) expressed willingness to enroll their children in CTs. However, 66% opposed new experimental treatments for their child, while 41% agreed to new treatments if they had previously been used in the medical field. Logistic regression analysis revealed key predictors influencing parents' decisions to include their children in CTs, including having a newborn (aOR = 17.651, Conclusion: Many parents are open to enrolling their children in CTs, particularly when treatments have been previously used. Factors like having a newborn, large family size, blood collection, additional tests, and home therapy influence their decisions. Clear communication can enhance recruitment in pediatric trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.