Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606641›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024

Integrating Machine Learning and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) Framework to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Inflammation Indices and Peripheral Lymphocyte Subpopulations.

Ziyu Zhu, Cong Wang, Lei Shi, Mengya Li, Jiaqi Li, Shiyin Liang, Zhidong Yin, Yingwei Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ziyu Zhu *Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Cong Wang *Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-7747-9564
Lei ShiDepartment of Oncology, Beidahuang Industry Group General Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Mengya LiKey Laboratory of Preservation of Genetic Resources and Disease Control in China, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Jiaqi LiKey Laboratory of Preservation of Genetic Resources and Disease Control in China, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Shiyin LiangKey Laboratory of Preservation of Genetic Resources and Disease Control in China, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Zhidong YinDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Yingwei XueDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8427-9736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer, a pivotal determinant affecting treatment approaches and prognosis, continues to pose a significant challenge in terms of accuracy. Methods: In this study, we employed a combination of machine learning methods and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to develop an integrated predictive model. This model utilizes the preoperatively obtainable parameter of the inflammatory index, aiming to enhance the accuracy of predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients. Results: Lymph node metastasis stands as an independent prognostic risk factor for gastric cancer patients. Among various models, XGBoost emerges as the optimal machine learning model. In the training set, the XGBoost model exhibited the highest AUC value of 0.705. In the test set, XGBoost demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.695, and the lowest Brier score of 0.218. Notably, in terms of feature importance, PLR emerged as the most significant factor influencing lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients. Through the screening of differentially expressed genes, we ultimately identified the prognostic value of six genes: IGFN1, CLEC11A, STC2, TFEC, MUC5AC, and ANOS1, in predicting survival. Conclusion: The XGBoost model can predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer patients based on the inflammation index and peripheral lymphocyte subgroups. Combined with SHAP, it provides a more intuitive reflection of the impact of different variables on LNM. PLR emerges as the most crucial risk factor for lymph node metastasis in the inflammation index among gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gastric CancerInflammation IndicesLymph Node MetastasisMachine LearningPeripheral Lymphocyte SubpopulationsSHAP Framework

Identifiers

PMID39606641
PMCPMC11600934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.