ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Enhanced skin cancer diagnosis: a deep feature extraction-based framework for the multi-classification of skin cancer utilizing dermoscopy images.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Assisted Early Detection of Skin Cancer from Dermoscopic Images in Underserved Clinical Settings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Foundation Learning for Robust and Data-Efficient Skin Disease Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is one of the most common, deadly, and widespread cancers worldwide. Early detection of skin cancer can lead to reduced death rates. A dermatologist or primary care physician can use a dermatoscope to inspect a patient to diagnose skin disorders visually. Early detection of skin cancer is essential, and in order to confirm the diagnosis and determine the most appropriate course of therapy, patients should undergo a biopsy and a histological evaluation. Significant advancements have been made recently as the accuracy of skin cancer categorization by automated deep learning systems matches that of dermatologists. Though progress has been made, there is still a lack of a widely accepted, clinically reliable method for diagnosing skin cancer. This article presented four variants of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model (i.e., original CNN, no batch normalization CNN, few filters CNN, and strided CNN) for the classification and prediction of skin cancer in lesion images with the aim of helping physicians in their diagnosis. Further, it presents the hybrid models CNN-Support Vector Machine (CNNSVM), CNN-Random Forest (CNNRF), and CNN-Logistic Regression (CNNLR), using a grid search for the best parameters. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) and random oversampling are performed to normalize and balance the data. The CNN models (original CNN, strided, and CNNSVM) obtained an accuracy rate of 98%. In contrast, CNNRF and CNNLR obtained an accuracy rate of 99% for skin cancer prediction on a HAM10000 dataset of 10,015 dermoscopic images. The encouraging outcomes demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and show that improving the performance of skin cancer diagnosis requires including the patient's metadata with the lesion image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.