Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606634›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Enhanced skin cancer diagnosis: a deep feature extraction-based framework for the multi-classification of skin cancer utilizing dermoscopy images.

Hadeel Alharbi, Gabriel Avelino Sampedro, Roben A Juanatas, Se-Jung Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hadeel AlharbiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hail, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Gabriel Avelino SampedroDepartment of Computer Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon, Philippines.
Roben A JuanatasCollege of Computing and Information Technologies, National University, Manila, Philippines.
Se-Jung LimSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Yeosu Campus, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is one of the most common, deadly, and widespread cancers worldwide. Early detection of skin cancer can lead to reduced death rates. A dermatologist or primary care physician can use a dermatoscope to inspect a patient to diagnose skin disorders visually. Early detection of skin cancer is essential, and in order to confirm the diagnosis and determine the most appropriate course of therapy, patients should undergo a biopsy and a histological evaluation. Significant advancements have been made recently as the accuracy of skin cancer categorization by automated deep learning systems matches that of dermatologists. Though progress has been made, there is still a lack of a widely accepted, clinically reliable method for diagnosing skin cancer. This article presented four variants of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model (i.e., original CNN, no batch normalization CNN, few filters CNN, and strided CNN) for the classification and prediction of skin cancer in lesion images with the aim of helping physicians in their diagnosis. Further, it presents the hybrid models CNN-Support Vector Machine (CNNSVM), CNN-Random Forest (CNNRF), and CNN-Logistic Regression (CNNLR), using a grid search for the best parameters. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) and random oversampling are performed to normalize and balance the data. The CNN models (original CNN, strided, and CNNSVM) obtained an accuracy rate of 98%. In contrast, CNNRF and CNNLR obtained an accuracy rate of 99% for skin cancer prediction on a HAM10000 dataset of 10,015 dermoscopic images. The encouraging outcomes demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and show that improving the performance of skin cancer diagnosis requires including the patient's metadata with the lesion image.

Indexed as

deep learningdermoscopy imagesfeature extractionlesionmeta-datamulti-classificationskin cancer diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39606634
PMCPMC11601079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.