SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Emerging trends and hotspots in intestinal microbiota research in sepsis: bibliometric analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A bibliometric and visual analysis of research trends and hotspots in sepsis-related immunosuppression (2005-2025).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The association between the gut microbiota and sepsis has garnered attention in the field of intestinal research in sepsis. This study utilizes bibliometric methods to visualize and analyze the literature on gut microbiota research in sepsis from 2011 to 2024, providing a scientific foundation for research directions and key issues in this domain. Methods: Original articles and reviews of gut microbiota research in sepsis, which published in English between 2011 and 2024, were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection on June 21, 2024. Python, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace software were used for the visual analysis of the retrieved data. Results: A total of 1,031 articles were analyzed, originating from 72 countries or regions, 1,614 research institutions, and 6,541 authors. The articles were published in 434 different journals, covering 89 different research fields. The number of publications and citations in this research area showed a significant growth trend from 2011 to 2024, with China, the United States, and the United Kingdom being the main research forces. Asada Leelahavanichkul from Thailand was identified as the most prolific author, making him the most authoritative expert in this field. "Nutrients" had the highest number of publications, while "Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology," "Frontiers in Immunology" and "the International Journal of Molecular Sciences" have shown increasing attention to this field in the past 2 years. Author keywords appearing more than 100 times included "gut microbiota (GM)," "sepsis" and "microbiota." Finally, this study identified "lipopolysaccharides (LPS)," "short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)," "probiotics," "fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)" and "gut-liver axis" as the research hotspots and potential frontier directions in this field. Conclusion: This bibliometric study summarizes current important perspectives and offers comprehensive guidance between sepsis and intestinal microbiota, which may help researchers choose the most appropriate research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.