ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Automated lung segmentation on chest MRI in children with cystic fibrosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Thoracic MRI: Safer, Sharper and Smarter Diagnostics.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated scoring of airway abnormalities and mucus plugging in chest magnetic resonance imaging of cystic fibrosis using artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Segmentation of lung structures in medical imaging is crucial for the application of automated post-processing steps on lung diseases like cystic fibrosis (CF). Recently, machine learning methods, particularly neural networks, have demonstrated remarkable improvements, often outperforming conventional segmentation methods. Nonetheless, challenges still remain when attempting to segment various imaging modalities and diseases, especially when the visual characteristics of pathologic findings significantly deviate from healthy tissue. Methods: Our study focuses on imaging of pediatric CF patients [mean age, standard deviation (7.50 ± 4.6)], utilizing deep learning-based methods for automated lung segmentation from chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 165 standardized annual surveillance MRI scans from 84 patients with CF were segmented using the nnU-Net framework. Patient cases represented a range of disease severities and ages. The nnU-Net was trained and evaluated on three MRI sequences (BLADE, VIBE, and HASTE), which are highly relevant for the evaluation of CF induced lung changes. We utilized 40 cases for training per sequence, and tested with 15 cases per sequence, using the Sørensen-Dice-Score, Pearson's correlation coefficient ( Results: The results demonstrated a high level of segmentation performance across all sequences, with only minor differences observed in the mean Dice coefficient: BLADE (0.96 ± 0.05), VIBE (0.96 ± 0.04), and HASTE (0.95 ± 0.05). Additionally, the segmentation quality was consistent across different disease severities, patient ages, and sizes. Manual evaluation identified specific challenges, such as incomplete segmentations near the diaphragm and dorsal regions. Validation on a separate, external dataset of nine toddlers (2-24 months) demonstrated generalizability of the trained model achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.85 ± 0.03. Discussion and conclusion: Overall, our study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of using nnU-Net for automated segmentation of lung halves in pediatric CF patients, showing promising directions for advanced image analysis techniques to assist in clinical decision-making and monitoring of CF lung disease progression. Despite these achievements, further improvements are needed to address specific segmentation challenges and enhance generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.