ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Effective automatic classification methods via deep learning for myopic maculopathy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for pathologic myopia classification based on the META-PM system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in pathologic myopia: a review of clinical research studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- MSLI-Net: retinal disease detection network based on multi-segment localization and multi-scale interaction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathologic myopia (PM) associated with myopic maculopathy (MM) is a significant cause of visual impairment, especially in East Asia, where its prevalence has surged. Early detection and accurate classification of myopia-related fundus lesions are critical for managing PM. Traditional clinical analysis of fundus images is time-consuming and dependent on specialist expertise, driving the need for automated, accurate diagnostic tools. Methods: This study developed a deep learning-based system for classifying five types of MM using color fundus photographs. Five architectures-ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, Vision Transformer (ViT), Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training (CLIP), and RETFound-were utilized. An ensemble learning approach with weighted voting was employed to enhance model performance. The models were trained on a dataset of 2,159 annotated images from Shenzhen Eye Hospital, with performance evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-Score, Cohen's Kappa, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The ensemble model achieved superior performance across all metrics, with an accuracy of 95.4% (95% CI: 93.0-97.0%), sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI: 86.8-97.5%), specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.1-99.5%), F1-Score of 95.3% (95% CI: 93.2-97.2%), Kappa value of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.957-0.989), and AUC of 0.995 (95% CI: 0.992-0.998). The voting ensemble method demonstrated robustness and high generalization ability in classifying complex lesions, outperforming individual models. Conclusion: The ensemble deep learning system significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of MM classification. This system holds potential for assisting ophthalmologists in early detection and precise diagnosis, thereby improving patient outcomes. Future work could focus on expanding the dataset, incorporating image quality assessment, and optimizing the ensemble algorithm for better efficiency and broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.