Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606617›Full record

ReviewWellcome open research2024

The Ubuntu Way: Ensuring Ethical AI Integration in Health Research.

Brenda Odero, David Nderitu, Gabrielle Samuel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brenda OderoStrathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-6873
David NderituEgerton University, Njoro, Nakuru County, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-2224
Gabrielle SamuelDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Bush House, North East Wing, Strand, King's College London, London, England, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health research has grown rapidly, particularly in African nations, which have also been developing data protection laws and AI strategies. However, the ethical frameworks governing AI use in health research are often based on Western philosophies, focusing on individualism, and may not fully address the unique challenges and cultural contexts of African communities. This paper advocates for the incorporation of African philosophies, specifically

Indexed as

AfricaArtificial Intelligence (AI)EthicsHealth ResearchUbuntu

Identifiers

PMID39606617
PMCPMC11599802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.