Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606600›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2024

A comparative study between fractional microneedling radiofrequency with systemic isotretinoin and fractional microneedling alone in the treatment of rosacea.

Anwar Issa Hasan, Kholod A Ali, Tuqa Mohammed Latif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anwar Issa HasanDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine AL-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Kholod A AliAl Nahrain University College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Tuqa Mohammed LatifDepartment of Dermatology, AL-Hakim General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease presenting with facial flushing, non-transient erythema, papules/pustules, telangiectasia, and phymatous changes. Secondary manifestations, such as itching, burning, or stinging, are often observed in patients with rosacea. The pathogenesis of rosacea is not fully understood, but immune dysfunction, Demodex infection, neurovascular dysregulation, and exposure to ultraviolet radiation represent contributing factors. Aim: To evaluate and compare effectiveness of fractional micro-needling radiofrequency with systemic isotretinoin and micro-needling alone in the treatment of rosacea. Material and methods: A cross-sectional comparative study between fractional microneedling radiofrequency with systemic isotretinoin and micro-needling alone in the treatment of rosacea was carried out in a private outpatient clinic and Al-Yarmouk teaching hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. Group A comprised 25 patients treated with systemic isotretinoin (10 mg/day) for 6 weeks and fractional microneedling radiofrequency for 16 weeks. Patients received a session every 2 weeks during the first 2 months of treatment then one session per month. Group B comprised 25 patients treated with fractional microneedling radiofrequency for 16 weeks. The patients received a session every 2 weeks during the first 2 months of treatment then one session per month. Measurement of baseline serum lipid profile, complete blood count, and liver enzyme levels was done to all patients receiving isotretinoin. All patients in both groups were instructed to use sunscreen and emollients. Follow-up of all patients was carried out for 3 months after treatment. Patients were assessment according to the Grade system of rosacea, patient satisfaction, and relapse rate. Relapse rate: no relapse (0), relapse (1). Patient satisfaction: poor (0), fair (1), and good (2). Results: There was no significant difference in the mean severity score for rosacea between group A and group B, before, after 8 weeks, and after 16 weeks. Patients in group A showed higher good satisfaction (72%) than group B (32%). During the follow-up period the relapse rate was higher in group B (32%) than in group A (16%), the percentage reduction (response rate) of the mean of severity score was 41.37% after 8 weeks and 91.37% after 16 weeks in group A, and 34.48% after 8 weeks and 82.75% after 16 weeks in group B. Conclusions: Fractional microneedling radiofrequency is a safe and effective method in the treatment of rosacea, and so it can be used when there are contraindications to other lines of therapy, when patients are resistant to long-term oral therapy, and when patients (including pregnant women) choose not to take oral or topical drugs.

Indexed as

effectivenessfractional microneedling radiofrequencyisotretinoine

Identifiers

PMID39606600
PMCPMC11589633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.