Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606555›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in global women's health2024

Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review.

Shayesteh Jahanfar, Julie Mortazavi, Amy Lapidow, Cassandra Cu, Jude Al Abosy, Kathyrn Morris, Juan Camilo Becerra-Mateus, Meredith Steinfeldt, Olivia Maurer, Jiang Bohang and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shayesteh JahanfarDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Julie MortazaviDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Amy LapidowDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Cassandra CuDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jude Al AbosyDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Kathyrn MorrisDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Juan Camilo Becerra-MateusDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Columbia.
Meredith SteinfeldtDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Olivia MaurerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jiang BohangDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Paola AndrenacciCochrane US Mentoring Program, Boston, MA, United States.
Marwa BadawyUS Mentoring Program, Boston, MA, United States.
Moazzam AliWHO Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contraceptives play a crucial role in women's reproductive health, their hormonal components may be linked to cancer risks, specifically breast, and gynecological cancers. Given the high usage rates of hormonal contraceptives, it is vital to systematically evaluate their potential impact on cancer outcomes, especially among women with a family history of gynecological cancers. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the evidence on the association between modern contraceptive use and the risk of breast and reproductive cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) among women of reproductive age, to inform healthcare providers, women, and program managers about cancer outcomes related to contraceptive use. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in databases such as CINAHL, OVID Medline, EMBASE, and more from inception to February 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared cancer outcomes between contraceptive users and non-users. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analyses were conducted following predefined protocols. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined variations in contraceptive methods, doses, and duration. Results: A total of 51 studies were included, comprising 2 RCTs and 49 observational studies. The review identified a significant reduction in ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence among contraceptive users. Hormonal contraceptive users had a 36% lower risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68), with specific reductions seen in combined oral contraceptive users (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68) and hormonal IUD users (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96). The rate ratio of cervical cancer was higher among non- users compared to hormonal contraceptive users when we pooled the results (1.28, 95% CI 1.21, 1.35). No significant association was found between contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among healthy women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). However, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers using oral contraceptives showed a heightened risk of breast cancer (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.67). Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the protective effects of modern contraceptives against ovarian and endometrial cancers while identifying an increased risk of cervical. No significant breast cancer risk was found for healthy women, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers faced increased risks. These findings underscore the need for personalized contraceptive counselling that considers cancer risk factors. Further research is needed to explore contraceptive impacts across different genetic profiles and dosing regimens. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Prospero (CRD42022332647).

Indexed as

breast cancercervical cancercontraceptivesendometrial cancerovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID39606555
PMCPMC11599208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.