ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy of Melatonin as a Promising Intervention for Migraine Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression of melatonin receptors in trigeminal and sphenopalatine ganglia: potential targets for primary headache disorders.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Melatonin as an anti-inflammatory hormone bridging migraine relief and cancer immunity enhancement: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability and use of melatonin as an over-the-counter supplement have surged significantly in recent years due to the increased prevalence of sleep-wake disorders, notably in the post-COVID-19 era. While melatonin is known for managing insomnia, its applications extend beyond that. Its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and analgesic properties, along with increased usage, have garnered significant interest from researchers, particularly regarding its use in migraine prophylaxis and treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of melatonin as prophylactic therapy for migraine, focusing on the efficacy and side effect profile of melatonin compared to standard therapy and placebo. Six databases were searched through June 2024, identifying 735 relevant articles. Only full-text randomized control trials involving humans, written or translated into English, were included in the study. Data were extracted, screened, sought for retrieval, and assessed for quality appraisal using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A total of seven randomized control trials involving 1,283 participants who met the eligibility criteria and passed the quality appraisal have been included in the study. All seven trials included patients diagnosed with migraine who were treated with either melatonin or agomelatine and were compared to those treated with conventional prophylactic therapy or placebo. The findings of this review suggest that melatonin significantly reduces the frequency and severity of migraines, but its dose-dependent action and benefits remain debatable. Melatonin may also have a role in weight control, warranting additional research in this direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.