Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606506›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Diagnostic Utility of Fever in Patients With Suspected Sepsis Secondary to Community-Acquired Bacteremia.

Phoebe Langius, Donny Perez, Sandra Lopez, Eric Boccio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phoebe LangiusEmergency Medicine, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Donny PerezEmergency Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, USA.
Sandra LopezEmergency Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, USA.
Eric BoccioEmergency Medicine, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Community-acquired bacteremia is a potential source of infection and cause of fever in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis. Ambiguous or false-positive blood culture results may lead to unnecessary testing and overtreatment with substantial implications on antimicrobial stewardship and associated healthcare costs. There is little clinical information available to determine with a high degree of certainty whether a patient may be febrile secondary to bacteremia. The primary aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of fever in patients with suspected sepsis secondary to community-acquired bacteremia. Methodology A retrospective review of a consecutive sample of electronic health records of patients presenting to the ED of an academic tertiary care hospital with an annual census of approximately 100,000 visits was performed. Structured demographic and clinical data were summarized. Receiver operating characteristics of fever, defined as an initial recorded temperature ≥38°C, in predicting bacteremia, defined as at least one positive blood culture result, were calculated. The associations between fever and bacteremia and admission and inpatient all-cause mortality rates were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 100,270 pediatric and adult ED visits were screened for eligibility. Of the 10,220 (10.2%) patients who had at least one blood culture result and temperature recorded, 1,175 (11.5%) were febrile and 487 (4.8%) had bacteremia. Febrile patients were more likely to have blood cultures drawn than afebrile patients (34% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and the median initial temperature was higher in patients with a positive blood culture result (37.1°C vs. 36.9°C, p < 0.001). Fever was not sensitive for bacteremia across pediatric, adult, and geriatric cohorts (25.0%, 21.6%, and 23.4%, respectively), but was more specific in adult and geriatric cohorts (90.2% and 92.1%, respectively) than the pediatric cohort (68.6%). A positive blood culture result was associated with an increased likelihood of admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.14-3.81, p < 0.001) and inpatient all-cause mortality (AOR = 3.67, 95% CI = 2.68-5.04, p < 0.001) while fever increased the likelihood of admission only (AOR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.36-1.83, p < 0.001). Conclusions A strict definition of a fever of ≥38°C is specific but not sensitive for bacteremia. Febrile patients are 1.58 times as likely to be admitted when compared to afebrile patients while adjusting for age, sex, and the presence of a positive blood culture result. Bacteremia is associated with increased admission and mortality rates in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED.

Indexed as

blood culturescommunity-acquired bacteremiafeverpatient-centered outcomes researchsepsis

Identifiers

PMID39606506
PMCPMC11601880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.