Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39606497›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Bridging Neuroscience and Clinical Practice: Accelerating Stroke Recovery in a Pontine Infarction Case Through Neuroplasticity-Based Rehabilitation.

Wanli Lei

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wanli LeiPhysical Therapy, College of Mathematics, Sciences, and Health Professions, Lincoln Memorial University, Knoxville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundational neuroscience is crucial to locating lesions, understanding current functional limitations, making correct prognoses, and designing holistic and realistic treatment plans for stroke patients. A model bridging neuroscience knowledge and clinical practice was assessed through a rare pontine infarction case. A 76-year-old patient suffered two consecutive right-sided pontine ischemic strokes, leading to significant motor and sensory abnormalities on the left side. After the strokes stabilized, the patient was admitted to Knoxville Rehabilitation Hospital on August 10, 2023, under an intensive rehabilitation program grounded in neuroscience-based principles of plasticity. Remarkably, the patient fully recovered sensation by August 17. The clinical presentations, which included no ipsilateral cranial nerve dysfunction but the contralateral compromise of cranial nerves V and VII, indicated lesions in the right middle to caudal basilar pons. Employing available brainstem motor control systems, including reticulospinal and vestibulospinal tracts, the rehabilitation team designed a task-oriented, realistic neuroplasticity program to focus on gross motor skills such as postural control, bed mobility, transfers, walking, and stair negotiation, dynamically adjusted daily according to the patient's progress, while waiting for the recovery of corticospinal tract. The patient successfully improved from varied levels of assistance to independently performing all tasks except stair negotiation, which required supervision due to safety concerns, possibly resulting from past silent cerebrovascular problems. The patient was discharged home on August 29 after demonstrating significant functional recovery. This study highlights leveraging foundational neuroscience knowledge to accelerate recovery and quickly improve stroke rehabilitation outcomes.

Indexed as

foundational neurosciencemotor control tractsneuroplasticitypontine infarctionrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39606497
PMCPMC11601994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.