ArticleResearch square2024
Safety outcomes and immunological correlates in a prospective clinical trial of immune checkpoint therapy plus debulking surgery for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical removal of primary tumors was shown to reverse tumor-mediated immune suppression in pre-clinical models with metastatic disease. However, how cytoreductive surgery in the metastatic setting modulates the immune responses in patients, especially in the context of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT)-containing treatments is not understood. Here, we report the first prospective, non-comparative clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility, clinical benefits, and immunologic changes of combining three different ICT-containing strategies with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Based upon baseline evaluation and surgical eligibility after 6 weeks of ICT treatment, 43 patients on this trial proceeded with cytoreductive surgery, while 36 patients who had medical comorbidities preventing surgery or did not have a lesion amenable for surgical resection underwent post-ICT biopsy as specified in the clinical trial protocol, and 25 patients who discontinued study participation due to progressive disease or toxicities or withdrawal of consent did not receive either procedure (total N=104). Our data demonstrated that, in the subgroup of patients receiving the combination of ICT with cytoreductive surgery or biopsy, no additional ICT- or procedure-related toxicities were observed as compared to historical data. The median OS (overall survival) was 54.7 months for patients who received ICT-containing regimens plus cytoreductive surgery (n=43). Immune-monitoring studies with co-detection by indexing (CODEX) identified distinct tumor spatial conformation of cellular subsets as a novel and improved predictor of response to ICT. Importantly, single-cell RNA-sequencing (sc-RNA-seq) data demonstrated that surgical removal of the tumor increased antigen-presenting dendritic cell population with a concurrent reduction in KDM6B-expressing immune-suppressive myeloid cells in the peripheral blood. Together, this study highlighted the feasibility of combining ICT with cytoreductive surgery in a metastatic setting and demonstrated the potential enhancement of immune responses following ICT plus cytoreductive surgery in patients with metastatic disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.