ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Negative BOLD Responses Surpass Positive Responses in Task Specificity, Reflecting Neural Reconfigurations Better Than Functional Connectivity.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the Negative BOLD Response (NBR) is more task-specific than the Positive BOLD Response (PBR) during cognitive tasks and to determine whether task-evoked activity reflects brain reconfigurations during different tasks better than functional connectivity. Methods: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data were collected from 214 participants under 50 years old (152 in Dataset 1 and 62 in Dataset 2) performing twelve cognitive tasks spanning vocabulary, speed of processing, fluid reasoning, and memory domains. Data analysis included subject-level and group-level analyses, focusing on comparing the spatial patterns and task specificity of NBR and PBR through similarity measures using Dice coefficients. Additionally, functional connectivity was assessed using the Multi-session Hierarchical Bayesian Model (MS-HBM) to evaluate its sensitivity to task-induced brain reconfigurations compared to task-evoked activity. Results: NBR demonstrated significantly greater task specificity compared to PBR across all cognitive tasks, with lower mean Dice coefficients for NBR maps (mean: 0.44, SD: 0.13) than for PBR maps (mean: 0.67, SD: 0.09; t(65) = 18.38, p < 0.001). Functional connectivity analyses indicated that the default mode network (DMN) remained stable across tasks, suggesting that task-evoked activity reflects task-specific brain reconfigurations better than functional connectivity. Conclusion: The findings confirm that NBR is inherently more task-specific than PBR and that task-evoked activity provides a more sensitive measure of task-specific neural reconfigurations than functional connectivity. This enhances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive processes and highlights the importance of considering NBR in cognitive neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.