ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Proof-of-Concept Validation of Noninvasive Detection of Cortical Spreading Depolarization with High Resolution Direct Current-Electroencephalography with Future Device Recommendations.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Objective: Cortical spreading depolarization (SD) is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to secondary brain injury. Noninvasive SD monitoring would enable the institution of SD-based therapeutics. Our primary objective is to establish proof-of-concept validation that scalp DC-potentials can provide noninvasive SD detection by comparing scalp direct-current (DC)-shifts from a high-density electrode array to SDs detected by gold-standard electrocorticography (ECoG). Our secondary objective is to assess usability and artifact tolerance. Methods: An 83×58 mm thermoplastic elastomer array with 29 6-mm diameter Ag/AgCl 1-cm spaced electrodes, the CerebroPatch Results: Usability and artifact issues obscured most scalp Prototype device data of the 140 ECoG-coded SDs during 11 days in one sub-arachnoid hemorrhage patient. Twenty-six of these DC-shifts were in readable, artifact-free portions of scalp recordings and 24 of these had a >0.80 Coefficient-of-Determination (0.98[0.02], median[IQR]) between invasive ECoG and noninvasive Prototype device DC-shifts. Reconstructed heat-map movies of the scalp DC-potentials showed a 5-cm extent, -460 μV peak region that persisted for ~70 sec. These data suggest that these scalp DC-shifts (peak -457±69 μV [mean±StD], full-width-half maximum 70.9±5.92 sec, area 18.7±2.76 cm Conclusions: These results using 26 SDs as the observational units suggest that noninvasive SD detection is possible using scalp DC-potential signals with a high spatial resolution EEG array. Although the high artifact burden data and low usability records were limiting, negative results, they serve as an important entrepreneurial recipe that provides suggestions for a future, re-designed device that would reduce artifacts and improve usability for DC-EEG SD detection needed to enable multi-modal monitoring for secondary brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.